When I first fell in love with Formula One, it was the racing that got me hooked.

I come from a non-sporty background, and hadn't seen a motor-race of any sort until my mid-twenties. But I was introduced to F1 and fell in love with it over the course of the 2007 season.

It was the action on track that first piqued my interest, but my obsession (and the throwing away of a stable career for a life in the sport) was triggered by the fact that Formula One feeds millions of my interests: history, politics, technology, drama, and psychology. Plus a bit of racing.

So I am always surprised when I run into people - particularly those who hold positions of power within the sport - who seem to be completely unaware of Formula One's historic legacy.

Christian Horner and Sebastian Vettel both wasted a lot of oxygen yesterday moaning about Lewis Hamilton's efforts to unlap himself during the German Grand Prix. To hear the Red Bull pair speak, Lewis' crime was akin to dancing on someone's grave - pointless and cruel.

Really? Really? Can they honestly be that ignorant of racing strategy, or of the possibility of dumb luck and a hell of a lot of effort meaning anything can happen?

Of course there was a point to Hamilton doing what he did. Strategically, he was gifting his teammate with the opportunity to catch and pass Vettel. At least, he would have been had Button not spent the bulk of the race asleep behind the wheel, failing to take advantage of opportunity after opportunity.

But on a personal note, Hamilton needed to unlap himself. Not only for pride's sake, but because - once he was on the same lap as the race leaders - there was also the (very remote) possibility that he could work his way back up through the field and into the fight for points.

Hamilton had one of the fastest cars on track yesterday. And because none of us can predict the future, it was in his interests to get as high up the pack as possible. One of the drivers could have taken out three colleagues with a stupid collision. All of the Ferrari-powered cars on track could have had a simultaneous engine failure. The stewards could have given half the grid drive-through penalties for various offenses.

This is racing. Anything can happen. And if a driver at the back of the pack is going to take advantage of those opportunities, he needs to be on the same lap as the leaders. Simples.

Just ask Jim Clark.
 


Comments

23/07/2012 16:08

Not sure if you have seen it yet, but Horner's argument was swept aside by Hill and Herbert with some authority and rightly.

There are times when I hear some young(er) drivers moan about "...having to take to the run off."
Here's a clue young man: "lift off the throttle !!"

Reply
23/07/2012 21:44

Love it!

There's a lot to be said for the argument that current levels of driver safety have removed a lot of the self-preservation thought processes previous generations of drivers relied on to survive.

Reply
mayhemfunkster
24/07/2012 11:11

Even in today's cars, they wouldn't do it on the run down to the Masta kink...or they might do it once...

24/07/2012 13:45

Just once, I'd love to see the Belgian GP on the classic circuit. The balls on show in historic footage of the Masts straight and kink...

24/07/2012 16:09

As far as I'm concerned, it they can race hard between the walls and barriers at Montreal, Monaco and Singapore, then they should do the old Spa too.
;)

25/07/2012 17:36

I was told (I think in Monaco) that recent heavy rains in the Ardennes had led to some of the old track - now public road - being destroyed by erosion and soil collapse. I don't know if it's true, and I presume that if it is they would have fixed it by now what with it being public road and all, but it was a real shock.

25/07/2012 18:35

Wise advice, Damn and Johnny. Several current F1 drivers would do well to heed it.

Reply
27/07/2012 14:16

Um... ...that was supposed to be "Damon", obviously. Sorry.

27/07/2012 15:37

My autocorrect meant I waxed lyrical about the Masts straight and kink on the old Spa the other day...

mayhemfunkster
23/07/2012 16:20

EXACTLY!

Reply
23/07/2012 16:27

Off topic and not F1, but have you heard any rumblings from the FIA this recent spate of rallying fatalities?
I've been a huge fan of rallying for some years and have seen some shocking accidents, but even this year's events are taking me aback.

Reply
23/07/2012 21:46

I haven't, but given Todt's rallying past and the FIA's approach to motorsport safety I'd expect them to make some sort of a statement/effort to improve standards in the not-too-distant future.

Reply
25/07/2012 18:38

I heard the FIA were doing investigations, but then the FIA investigates every fatal accident in international competition. If they come up with any new ideas to make the sport safer, I'm sure we will hear of them as and when they arise.

Reply
25/07/2012 19:48

I take some comfort in the fact that we've not had any knee-jerk comments coming from them - the fact that they're investigating without commenting suggests to me that they're doing a thorough and considered job of it.

elephino
25/07/2012 04:44

As long as Hamiltin didn't overtake Vettel then slow his pace to push Vettel back to Button, then there is no argument that can be made.

One genuine scenario you missed, Kate, is Hamilton unlapping himself, followed by SC allowing him to run up to the back of the pack (though even that wasn't required with the unlapping under SC silliness).

Reply
25/07/2012 17:38

I didn't list all of the scenarios because to attempt to do so would have meant I'd still be writing the piece now.

One of the most important skills in journalism is knowing when to stop typing.

Reply
elephino
27/07/2012 04:28

That explains some of the crap journos out there :)

25/07/2012 19:38

If Sebastian thinks Lewis' move was a problem, it's just as well he wasn't racing a front-running GTE-Pro at Sebring this year.

The two leading cars (the #56 BMW and #71 AF Corse) were minding their own business having an enormous battle on the last lap when another car in the same class (the #51 AF Corse) some way down the order attempted to unlap them. The #51 got the procedure on its team-mate wrong, overshot the corner - and clouted the poor #56 BMW in the lead fight. All three cars finished the race, with the #56 winning (its damage was luckily minimal), the #71 dropping to 3rd in the confusion and the #51 limping across the line, covered in distance marker board and carrying a puncture.

The driver of the #56 BMW was unsurprisingly incandescent at nearly losing the race*, and the ensuing investigation resulted, among other things, in the #51 AF Corse getting disqualified. This was not as big a penalty as it sounded... ...because the #51 had been nearly 100 laps down on the class leaders at the time. Not only was the car not classified, but it wouldn't have been anywhere near getting classified even had it unlapped itself successfully. Quite what it was doing anywhere near the lead battle was a question nobody managed to satisfactorily answer...

At least Sebastian will never find himself in a scenario quite that bad!

* - As soon as the #56's driver (Joey Hand) got out of his BMW after the win, he went to a media microphone and delivered a spectacular rant. Turns out for some reason he and the driver of the #71 had some long-standing grudge, which resulted in several aspersions being cast against the #71's sporting integrity. Hand's reaction on being told the #71 was innocent and the #51 was the antagonist on this occasion is (mercifully) unrecorded.

Reply
25/07/2012 19:41

And Jeremy Shaw was very angry on air as well. It was a stupid move by Bruni to even think of unlapping himself in that situation.

Reply
25/07/2012 23:28

I was miffed too, and I'm a fan of his. Having a car damaged by an accident and alternator/clutch problems do not render it immune to the laws of physics...

25/07/2012 23:32

In extension to that, there was a sportscar chat the Tuesday after Sebring. I ended up asking the journalist hosting the chat (John Dagys) for an (electronic) paper bag for my head...

25/07/2012 19:50

Okay, I know I shouldn't laugh, but that is the best story ever. I would LOVE to see a driver come back from 100 laps down. That driver would be my hero for life.

Thanks for passing it on - I was completely unaware.

Reply
25/07/2012 23:48

Coming back from 100 laps down (successfully) would be very impressive. The proportional F1 equivalent would be someone having a technical failure in the pit lane before the start at Hungary, emerging on lap 26 and winning regardless. Of course, starting that fightback on lap 26 would be a considerable help - trying to gain all that time back on the last lap would probably require technology unknown to the human race at this time. Or a spectacular series of mishaps for those ahead.




Leave a Reply