Marussia have issued a rather unsatisfying press release on the subject of Maria de Villota's testing accident. The release in question has been copied in full below.

Unsatisfying is an odd word to use to describe a press release, but I was expecting rather more in the way of information from an email entitled 'Duxford Testing Accident: Marussia F1 Team concludes its own investigations'.

The release explains that the team has concluded its internal investigations into the accident, and has passed on its findings to the Health & Safety Executive, but offers no information beyond the fact that there were no car-related implications for the British Grand Prix.

What the release does appear to say is that it was the driver who was to blame - team principal John Booth does not assign any culpability in his comments, but does say "the findings of our internal investigation exclude the car as a factor in the accident".

If the car was not a factor in the accident, then - by implication - the driver was at fault. It will be interesting to see the findings of the HSE when their investigation has been concluded.

14 days after Maria De Villota’s accident at Duxford Airfield, the Marussia F1 Team has now completed its own detailed investigation into the cause of the crash.

The accident occurred on 3 July during a straight-line test, at which Maria was making her testing debut for the Team and driving an F1 car for the fourth time in her career.

The Marussia F1 Team conducted an initial analysis immediately after the crash. This aimed to identify the causes and contributory factors behind the accident and also served to determine if there were any car-related implications for the impending British Grand Prix. Having carefully examined all the data and supplementary information available at that time, the Team were satisfied that there were no such car-related issues and cleared its chassis for race weekend participation.

Following its initial investigation, the Team proceeded to carry out further detailed analysis of the accident. An external forensic investigation was commissioned and carried out at Duxford Airfield (a FIA-approved and much used testing venue, compliant with the recommendations for a test of this nature) and with the team at the Marussia Technical Centre in Banbury. This external analysis has been carried out autonomously of the team’s own internal investigation.

As would be normal procedure, the Team’s findings have been shared with the Health & Safety Executive (HSE), the independent UK regulator which acts in the public interest in respect of work-related accidents.

John Booth, Team Principal of the Marussia F1 Team, commented: "We are satisfied that the findings of our internal investigation exclude the car as a factor in the accident. We have shared and discussed our findings with the HSE for their consideration as part of their ongoing investigation. This has been a necessarily thorough process in order to understand the cause of the accident. We have now concluded our investigatory work and can again focus on the priority, which continues to be Maria’s wellbeing. In that regard, we continue to support Maria and the De Villota family in any way we can."
 


Comments

16/07/2012 14:41

This may be an obvious conclusion, but I would imagine the legal-eyes ran through that statement several times, ensuring there was no direct attribution of blame toward de Villota, while also exonerating the car.

Undoubtedly, laying "blame" directly at MdV might possibly leave them open to court proceedings, while also tarnishing the reputation of the team, who I'm sure would not wish to described as unashamedly harsh.

Reply
16/07/2012 15:53

Good points, well made.

Reply
19/07/2012 17:12

There's also the possibilities of procedural or facility fault, neither of which are specifically excluded (or included) from blame Marussia's press release. If there's a possibility that either contributed to Maria's accident, there could have been legal ramification if an opinion had been expressed either way and the investigation's results didn't support such conclusiveness.

I think this is a protective press release to ensure there are no legal ramifications for them to run their cars in the rest of the 2012 season. The press release didn't need to do anything else - from Marussia's perspective - so it doesn't.

Reply
20/07/2012 15:39

Procedural fault is certainly a possibility, but I don't think it will be down to the facility - it's been approved by the FIA for straight-line testing, and that approval would have been revoked had the facility been deemed unsafe.

TonyTaylor
17/07/2012 19:05

As Sir Humphrey Appleby would put it a perfect parliamentary answer.
Wouldn't it be better to have these tests at proper facility with permanent pits etc.

Reply
18/07/2012 12:59

It would, in theory, but when it comes to straight-line testing, which the teams do not infrequently, one of the primary concerns has always been the cost/convenience thing. So teams will either build a stop-off for a straight-line test into their travel plans between European races, or they'll pop to a nearby facility like Duxford, rather than packing up and freighting men and machine over to Jarama, or wherever.

I'd be surprised if the facilities aren't reexamined after this, but Duxford is FIA-approved as a straight-line testing venue at the moment.

Reply
elephino
19/07/2012 06:12

If there is a restricted zone around the vehicle path where no other vehicles can be parked, that would be a simple and quick way of improving the situation short-term.

20/07/2012 15:36

In theory there is, and had the car not accelerated unexpectedly she wouldn't have hit the truck. How big do the exclusion zones need to be to guarantee safety? It could get pretty silly.

I'm reminded of the Titanic episode of Futurama, where all 600 hulls rupture, and Fry says 'If only they'd built it with 601!' - whatever precautions you take, there will always be that one situation where it just wasn't enough.

20/07/2012 15:57

Futurama... Seven shades of genius.

20/07/2012 16:00

I've long preferred it to The Simpsons. Is that heretical of me?

20/07/2012 16:02

No, but co-incidental that the Simpson's quality turned south, around about the time some of the Simpson's writers moved over to Futurama...

20/07/2012 19:06

And that The Simpsons improved briefly while Futurama was cancelled...




Leave a Reply