You know what I *love* about life? How depressing the news is. There’s nothing I like more, after a hard day’s work at the coalface, than settling down on the sofa with my loved ones and learning just how much more screwed up the world has become in the past 24 hours.

Yup, nothing says relaxation to me quite like all of the ‘HORROR! DOOM! CRISIS!’ stories that beseech us all to be afraid – be very afraid – of the world around us.

In today’s edition of let’s make an already shitty thing substantially worse comes the news that big chunks of the planet that seemed to have escaped the financial crisis are now succumbing to recession in style. Yay! Those of us who’d hoped to manufacture and export our way out of a double (triple?) dip recession now have no customers left. Double yay!

Europe’s inability to afford imports is beginning to have an impact on territories previously thought to be largely unaffected. One of the worst-hit countries has been Japan: not only have they had to deal with the aftermath of last year’s earthquake/tsunami/Fukushima triple threat, which obviously had a dramatic effect on manufacturing output, but exports to the European Union are down a mammoth 25.1 percent.

And while the Japanese had hoped that Europe’s shortfall would be made up by an increase in exports to China, sales to their near neighbour have fallen by 11.9 percent over the course of the past year.

China is supposed to be the big economic success of the 21st century, but those analysts who have kept a careful eye on the earth’s most populous country have long been suspicious of the economic claims being made by Beijing. The country supplies its own figures with regard to manufacturing output, imports and exports, and the like. Those figures are difficult to verify, and have been viewed with increasing incredulity over the past decade.

One statistic that is externally measurable – and which casts doubt on the financial figures provided by Beijing – is China’s use of power. In an era when the Chinese government has been adamant that the country is growing, and growing quickly, China’s kilowatt hours spent months in decline. That is not in keeping with the publicised levels of growth.

Kilowatt hours have since stabilised, but China’s manufacturing index fell yesterday, with new business and new export orders both down to levels last seen in 2009, during the early stages of the financial crisis. In addition, China’s manufacturing output index is falling, and their output index is low.

Combine China’s drop in power usage with its drop in imports and the implication is that the Chinese economy is contracting, even if the government currently says otherwise.

And a contracting Chinese economy will spell trouble world-wide. Recent years have seen a lot of Chinese money funnelled into Australia, and to a certain extent that investment has helped insulate the country from the worst of the financial crisis. South Africa is another country to have deep economic ties with China; the two have traded goods and technology for years, and are currently involved in a number of sizeable energy projects.

Brazil is at particular risk because of its growing dependence on China. Over the past decade, the South American country has seen a significant decline in manufacturing, and is now reliant on its role as a supplier of raw materials to China. As China’s economy contracts, so too will Brazil be affected.

But while a weakening China will obviously have a domino effect around the world, such is the economic might of the Asian giant, a number of its regional neighbours are also suffering the effects of the current economic situation: in the first two weeks of August, South Korea’s exports were down 12.4 percent on the same period in 2011, leading to a sizeable trade deficit.

So why all this focus on the economy? It struck me that the list of countries currently in something of a financial predicament – and the list of those on their way into trouble – shares an awful lot of entries with the list of countries on the F1 calendar.

Now, I am not positing any sort of causal link between hosting a grand prix and a struggling domestic economy. Far from it. Rather, I wonder to what extent those races will be at risk should the global economy plunge deeper into recession, prompting governments to refine their list of priorities.
 


Comments

Auntie Loch-Braiques
24/08/2012 23:44

You paint a very depressing picture, but you paint it very well indeed.

Reply
26/08/2012 21:01

Thanks! Sorry to depress...

Reply
elephino
29/08/2012 07:19

Australian news appears to be poking at the edges of what you've written about, especially China's spending (at least their spending in Aus) but aren't willing to quite doom & gloom it just yet.

It will be interesting to see what happens with the economic scenario and what effect it will have on the cost of hosting a GP. Indycar, for example, are being forced to reduce their pricing to the circuits but, while saying that, it's not a great comparison as a chunk of the reason is due to lack of interest (either TV or attendance).

30/08/2012 19:49

But at least IRL seem to be reacting. I think we're seeing the beginning of a change in attitudes in F1, but we're definitely moving slowly in this arena.

25/08/2012 22:30

It's especially interesting, because the Middle East can't keep spending.
So when nobody has any money, will the nominal price be "reconfigured" or does the first world continue to push after unrealistic numbers?

Reply
26/08/2012 21:03

God only knows. As you say, the Middle East won't have money forever. But a number of pundits take an optimistic approach, saying that it's in the times of greatest need that humans are at their most innovative, and I'm hoping they're right.

Reply
28/08/2012 17:19

The demand for oil will likely drop, but tOPEC is in a position to simply raise the price to compensate. That will keep the oil-dependent nations afloat for a few years, by which point maybe - just maybe - some of the people into the recession first will be starting to emerge from it and thus able to make up for the Middle East's inability to spend. At that point, we'll lose the Middle East countries, but the more enlightened of the EU ones, alongside countries like Canada and the USA which appear to be weathering the current storm relatively well, will be able to provide races.

The unrealistic numbers will continue to be pushed until those doing the pushing realise it's going to affect them. Those pushers without customers (mostly the credit agencies) are so few that I think there would be a revolt (or whatever the more civil version is - I'm thinking removal of offending individuals and policies by political or corporate words is more likely than removal by violence) against them that forces a change.

I think the rate of spending globally (and, therefore, in F1) will stabilise at a lower level than seen last decade, simply because it will need to be fuelled by money that actually exists rather than money that only ever existed in people's heads. (Hopefully that will also mean a much stabler economy).

Reply
30/08/2012 19:48

The pundits I've spoken to about this are all more positive than the average man on the street, which I find somewhat heartening.

But I think that F1 is going to have to reassess the way it relates, financially, to the world at large - we're as vulnerable as anyone else to the swings in global fortunes, and it's well worth remembering that.




Leave a Reply