It doesn't matter how rich you are, some sums of money are massive. Anything with billion in the name is a lot of money no matter how you choose to look at it.

The Indian Supreme Court today ordered Sahara - part owners of the Force India Formula One team - to repay $3 billion to a group of their investors. According to the Supreme Court judgment, Sahara's fundraising - which saw $3 billion raised by millions of small investors - violated the country's securities regulations.

Between 2008 and 2011, Sahara raised $3.18 billion from 22 million private investors, the majority of whom had been inspired to invest in the brand following its high-profile involvement in Indian sport, primarily cricket.

According to Reuters, the bulk of those investors came from poor and rural areas with low banking penetration.

"They see Sahara on television everyday as sponsor of the cricket team and that leads them to believe that this is the best company," a spokesman for the Investors and Consumers Guidance Cell, a consumer activist group, told Reuters

Sahara have been ordered to reimburse their investors within three months, and to pay 15 percent interest on the desposits made with the company.

The effect that this ruling is likely to have on Force India is still to be determined, but it is widely believed that it is Sahara's cash that has been keeping the team afloat since late 2011.

Vijay Mallya's financial woes have been well-documented, and the news that the team's other major investor is now having to pay out a hefty sum of cash does not look good for the Silverstone-based racers.
 


Comments

31/08/2012 15:36

That makes Vijay Mallya's airline troubles look minor - Kingfisher Airlines could probably be bailed out for less than $3 billion, at least with regard to the current problems...

In fairness to the courts, the scheme does sound like a particularly lousy way to make a profit. An example had to be made.

Reply
31/08/2012 18:22

I don't know enough about the way the Sahara Group is structured to know which investments will be affected by what (yay, so clear and eloquent!), but I can't imagine any business would be totally unaffected by a $3 billion loss in three months.

These could be troubling times for Force India, which would be a real shame - there are a lot of lovely people working there who rely on their salaries for fripperies like rent, bills, and food money.

Reply
01/09/2012 03:25

It gets worse. If [url=http://www.legallyindia.com/201208313078/Corporate/sc-applies-record-3bn-screws-to-sahara-lines-up-crim-case-what-gives]Legally India[/url] is anything to go by, this may only be the start of Sahara's troubles. Apparently there's another cluster of criminal cases due to be seen by the courts due to the Indian state prosecutor going on the warpath in the securities market. Sahara has a lot of interest in the securities market.

It's not clear whether the rest of Sahara's interest is on a similar basis to the element that was ruled invalid. If it does have anything else overstepping the limit of what is right and correct, I can see the judges throwing the book at it (again). Sahara isn't Microsoft or Apple, so there are limits to its funds, but I'm not sure what those limits are. There are occasions, when reading through the literature, when I wonder if anyone outside Sahara and the Indian tax office could provide even an approximate answer with confidence...

It helps that there are two companies involved in keeping Force India alive. While it's unlucky that both have hit trouble simultaneously for different reasons, Vijay's side is in a position to put in money, at least for now. At worst, that should buy time to get an investor whose source of investment isn't going to collapse on anyone's ears any time soon.

Force India deserves more reliable funding - and better luck in its leaders. It will be a shame to lose Vijay Mallya, who has done the team some good with his leadership, but like Eddie Jordan before him, the time has come to pass the baton and concentrate on other things.

02/09/2012 11:56

God, that's a good find! If you can say that about bad news, anyway.

India is such a complicated place to do business - I used to do a lot of news editing for an Indian outlet, and the stories I read blew my mind. Thanks to problems with corruption and cronyism, often people are made examples of more because they've pissed off the wrong people than because they've been doing anything dodgy.

Not that I am making any judgements about the Sahara case with the above comment - I don't know enough about it.




Leave a Reply