Last Friday in Monza, I was invited to a talk on the upper floor of the McLaren motorhome. Never one to miss a free breakfast, I jumped at the chance to join a small group of journalists for a talk about the connected car, autonomous vehicles, and motorsport's role in what some view as the dark future of the self-driving automobile.

It was an interesting discussion in which the people from Freescale Semiconductors managed to make a number of complex concepts in engineering and communications technology understandable to the layman by explaining everything in the context of our mobile phones.

The short version is that F1 telemetry harvesting and data management is being used to inspire connected vehicles that at some point in the future - the year 2020 was mentioned... - will lead to fully autonomous vehicles able to prevent accidents and ensure no one ever breaks the speed limit ever again.

The good news is that autonomous vehicles should bring about an end to traffic jams, as they'll all divert themselves onto empty roads at the slightest sniff of congestion. Journey times will be improved, everyone will be safer as cars mandate safe gaps between vehicles, no one will ever be lost, and you will be automatically driven to a parking space without any need to seek one out.

Because the vehicles - we can't really call them cars anymore - will not be restricted by traditional safety parameters, what with being uncrashable and all (can anyone say 'the Titanic is unsinkable' with me?) designers can go mad, and we'll be treated to all manner of abstract personal transportation pods. 

And the bad news? Well, it just doesn't sound like driving will be fun anymore. No breaking the speed limit, no finding that perfect line on that swooping country road you know about, no more of anything unless you're paying to have a go in a historic car on a private bit of track.

Just pootling around in an automated bubble designed to lull you into a braindead sense of security. Because when we're not watching TV we're thinking too much, and who can support that?

And that's just looking at the whole thing from a (paranoid, petrolhead) first world point of view.

I'm hardly going to run around advocating that people die on the roads, but here in the first world we've actually got a pretty good handle on road safety. There's always room for improvement, and zero is the ideal number of road deaths, but the real tragedies continue to happen in the developing world.

Countries in sub-Sarahan Africa have shocking rates of deaths on the road. Many motorcyclists in the region wear dried gourds in lieu of crash helmets, as it's the only manner of head protection they can afford. Driving standards in India and China see horrific road death statistics in both countries.

While it's all good and well introducing the concept of a connected vehicle with a view to improving road safety, it will take a very long time before these connected vehicles hit the second- and third-hand markets and wind up in the hands of those who need them most.

If the designers of the connected vehicle are sincere in their avowed desire to improve safety standards around the world, they must find a simple and inexpensive way of integrating this technology into existing vehicles so that the developing world can begin benefiting from the added level of road safety at the same time as the developed world does.
 


Comments

15/09/2012 01:40

I'm an optimist on that question. Automation should be a relatively simple matter of wiring the various functions of a car to an electronic control unit and a GPS link to somewhere that would update for changes* in traffic laws, roadworks and so on, things that are known to engineers in many countries. Particularly with cars already produced in middle-income countries (which is a greater number than some in high-income countries may want to admit), it should not be particularly difficult for retro-fitted solutions to be devised. Especially once there's an international standard in place that can be used to check such designs are capable of making the sort of decisions necessary for an automated car to avoid collisions and inadvertent traffic violations.

Provided the political will is there (which is admittedly an if), I think there could be an international standard developed, and urban/primary intercity automated routes in middle-income countries could be brought "online" very close to the time it happens in the wealthiest nations. The true trick will be making it happen in the poorest nations, where it may be difficult persuading influential people that road safety is as important as food, water and the Foreign Minister's dovecote. The FIA has an important role to play in this area.

* - Yes, I realise that would be a problem in countries that don't like GPS or sometimes struggle with GPS reception. Hopefully a solution can be found that's viable in those situations, even if it's a warning alarm and a "manual override" mode.

Reply
15/09/2012 17:13

The technology can be fitted to the cars, but we also need to make sure that the data infrastructure is in place to ensure no signal blackouts/the existence of a back-up system in the events of one failure.

Don't get me wrong - I love technology, and I think the opportunities exist to do something impressive with a partly automated and fully connected vehicle, but I worry that the engineers will try to press ahead too quickly with the technology without taking the potential social ramifications into account.

Reply
15/09/2012 15:14

Ahhhhh.... but how will Automatic cars deal with pedestrians and cyclists?
;)

Reply
15/09/2012 17:08

We'll all be chipped by then! They're in our fillings! *dances off in a fetching tinfoil hat*

Reply
15/09/2012 17:10

Still say the robot cars will take over and kill us all though.

15/09/2012 17:14

I don't trust any technology I can't unplug or remove the battery from.

16/09/2012 02:33

Having had 3 teeth out this week, partly because a filling wouldn't stay put, I think the conspiracy will need a back-up plan for me ;) *puts on tinfoil hat anyway*

16/09/2012 11:31

You just *think* they were removed, You've actually been fitted with InvisiDent3000s, the latest in molar-tracking technology. ;p

Jem
15/09/2012 23:48

The issue, as always, is how you roll this sort of thing out. It only really achieves much on a full scale if every car is computer controlled (or at least fitted with the telemetry and communications gear), otherwise you can't be entirely sure of the data - unequipped cars are almost invisible to the system.

Presumably it'll start with things like certain stretches of motorways (M6 Toll anyone?) becoming auto-control only zones and grow slowly from there.

Reply
16/09/2012 11:34

The slow roll-out I don't have a problem with, but the engineers were doing the usual brave new world thing engineers do when they're excited by a concept, and said that we were looking at 2020 for properly autonomous vehicles.

That's way too soon! I don't want a self-driving car until I've gone ten years without any sort of crash or systems failure on my computer or phone. Because when they fail, I shout at them. When millions of autonomous cars fail all at once? I'm sure that first 10,000 person traffic accident will be popular with the people...

(I'm usually pro-tech and glass half full. Today I am worried that someone has poisoned my glass and I want a new one.)

Reply
Jem
16/09/2012 23:15

Well yes, that's half the issue - especially with any network communication system. The network drops and everyone loses control. Let's not even discuss hackers, jammers or any other deliberate attack.

Roll out for 2020 sounds insanely optimistic - it's hard enough to get people to accept automatic transmissions despite the clear advantages of a modern automatic in terms of performance and economy.

18/09/2012 22:17

Chances are they meant 2020 before there was one example that worked properly. The other zillion will need a fair while to be properly integrated into people's lives...

elephino
18/09/2012 10:03

Kate, your title puns are almost as good as Joe Saward's :)
(and topped off nicely with the music video)

Reply
18/09/2012 11:41

Pah, my puns are WAY better than Joe's! If you like an endless stream of '90s music references, anyway. ;p

I always sit with Joe and DT at races. One of the ways we pass the time in dull sessions is by coming up with endless lists of terrible punning headlines to use on our pieces over the course of the weekend. It's a lot more fun than I make it sound. :)

Glad you like the videos! As I can't afford photos, I want to have *some* visuals on the page to break up all the text. Why not give people a random soundtrack to read to? ;p

Reply



Leave a Reply