So James Key has been confirmed as technical director of Toro Rosso.

Regular readers of this site (are there any of you out there?) will have read my piece over the Hockenheim weekend in which I stated that Key would be making the move to the Red Bull Junior team, although I'll admit that the official move happened more quickly than I'd assumed it would.

To assume makes an ass out of...

The appointment of Key is a good one for the team. While Giorgio Ascanelli is a fine technical director, he lacked the aerodynamic background that Toro Rosso needs if they are to move up to the next level.

I would have split the technical director role in two, giving one man responsibility for aero and the other for engineering, but there's probably a very good reason I'm not in charge of HR for an F1 team. Like my total lack of suitability for the role.

Anyway, while it's sad to see the back of Ascanelli - his habit of responding to fatuous questions in Latin will be sorely missed by this journalist - I imagine that the popular Italian will be returning to the paddock in the not too distant future.

On to Key, then who might prove to be just what Toro Rosso need if they are to unlock (fnar, fnar!) the team's true potential.

Key was instrumental in the development of this year's Sauber, which is still widely seen as the best of the field when it comes to overall aero balance. With a car designed under his stewardship, Toro Rosso should find themselves in a position to fight among the stronger mid-field teams next year, instead of at the back of the pack as has been the case for much of 2012.

[Note]:  Due to fat fingers, the last line originally said 2013 and has been corrected. We're not living in the future. Not until F1 goes to Japan, anyway.
 


Comments

gdon
06/09/2012 18:07

Of course we are around (at least i am) and check your blog almost everyday. I must compliment you on your style of writing, it has me coming back for more

Reply
06/09/2012 19:57

Wow, thanks very much! I do my best to report the news with tongue firmly planted in cheek. :)

Reply
06/09/2012 22:06

Sorry, but I think you meant "instead of at the back of the pack as has been the case for much of 2012" rather than "2013". Other than that, I think you are absolutely right. James did a great job at Midland/Spyker/Force India on a tight budget. I was surprised to see him leave Sauber so soon after he joined them, but the car he's left them with is great.

Giorgio has done a good job at Toro Rosso too. It would not surprise me if a budget-conscious team (which these days is at least half of them) selected him for a top role. Likely there will be more Latin responses to fatuous questions in the F1 paddock's future ;)

Reply
06/09/2012 22:09

DAMN MY FAT FINGERS! And the fact that I am now on my phone and can't make the relevant edit. :(

Reply
Sam Laird
07/09/2012 01:06

Kate, there are lots of good reasons not to be in charge of HR for Toro Rosso, and being right is only one of them...

Monza is a good place to reflect on the difference someone like Ascanelli can make at the track: four short years ago, Vettel scored his first F1 win here for Toro Rosso; he started from pole, with teammate Bourdais 4th on the grid. At the time, Mateschitz's lead team Red Bull Racing, with all the design and strategic genius money could buy, had never won a Grand Prix.

Time flies, eh?

Reply
07/09/2012 09:26

It's mad, isn't it? I remember watching the race from my sofa and having my fishy little mind blown by STR's potential.

Look at the performance differential now...

Reply
Optimaximal
07/09/2012 10:42

That's a fantastic point. Monza is such an aero-neutral track (well, obviously not neutral, but really, it's about cars going fast then turning a bit, then fast again) that pure engineering wins over trick aero.

My memory is fuzzy, but did Patrick Head's cars always do well here?

Reply
07/09/2012 18:45

Off the top of my head, I think so. But I've not actually had the time to go back through and check. Professionalism FTW!

f1fanaticbd
08/09/2012 15:21

In that race it was soaking wet Kate, and they got there because they were among the first to get the lap times before the rain hit. But I am not taking anything away from Vettel, for me it was almost live replay of '84 Senna (Though I regard Senna superior), and echoing the commentators in '84, it would be not inappropriate "World is watching the arrival of Vettel".

Reply
09/09/2012 19:32

I'm of the opinion that timing the runs (and nailing the strategy) is as much a part of winning as the actual driving. Look at Ferrari and McLaren in Malaysia 2010! Serious oops moment from the front runners there...




Leave a Reply