It's all doom and gloom in the F1 press right now, isn't it? Winter testing is usually such a positive time, a period where the cars are all potential race winners and the drivers potential champions.

Ordinarily, February is so damn positive it's a little sick-making...

But this is no ordinary February, is it? Despite good news like this week's Emirates sponsorship announcement, it's been hard to avoid the gloomier fare: F1 has priced itself out of its traditional European heartland, as evidenced by the still vacant 21 July slot on the calendar; small teams are collapsing under the financial pressures and either folding completely or going pay to play.

As grid and calendar (temporarily) shrink in concert, brows are furrowed and grey hairs grown.

Complicating matters further is the still pesky matter of the not-quite-fully-signed Concorde Agreement. While there's no suggestion that the 2013 season won't happen, there may well be a sense of regulatory lawlessness about the whole thing.

“We're good a creating crises in our sport and we're good at not sorting them out," McLaren team principal Martin Whitmarsh said in Jerez. “We need to have somebody come out and say  'peace in our time', wave a bit of paper and say 'here's a new Concorde Agreement'. But I'm not sure everyone is motivated to do it.

“I think it is tough [financially]," he added. “We are in the world of advertising and if you look at advertising worldwide the rate card is down. I think, fortunately, we've taken some measures but it's going to be tough for some of the teams to have a viable business model for a few years. There's no doubt about that.

“At the moment Bernie's doing a fantastic job for the owners [CVC Capital Partners]. We can criticise Bernie, but he's doing his job better than we're doing. On behalf of his employers, that money is coming out of our sport. As you can imagine, that is deeply frustrating for some of us in the sport but that's exactly what Bernie should be trying to do.

“If the teams aren't cohesive enough to work together to claim a larger share of that then they've got to blame themselves. I've certainly tried quite hard in that area and clearly not been as successful as I'd like to have been. Bernie's pretty good at moving the pieces around the board, isn't he?"

Today in London Bernie met with a group of the smaller team bosses to discuss the future of Formula One going forward. The meeting follows earlier discussions with representatives from Ferrari, McLaren, Mercedes, and Red Bull, and was expected to cover the unsigned Concorde, cost controls - particularly with reference to the incoming 2014 engine change - and the possibility of reintroducing customer cars.
 


Comments

elephino
08/02/2013 01:41

Interesting that Bernie has separated the meetings into the haves and have nots. While he may not play one against the other, it gives him the option if he wants it.

Reply
08/02/2013 15:17

I'd be pretty miffed to discover I was viewed as an other, not as a powerbroker... Maybe it's a bit of psychological warfare before the games even begin? Stroke some egos, deflate others?

Reply
08/02/2013 04:34

Does Martin Whitmarsh remember what happened after the last time "peace in our time" was uttered? F1 really can't afford civil war at this point...

Reply
08/02/2013 15:18

But we're so good at it!

Reply
08/02/2013 14:38

We know that customer cars aren't on the agenda really. The B has been sniping at Luca di M for the last three years whenever Ferrari has raised the question culminating with the off-season slagging match between the two. But if we've got paying drivers then why not let them buy a nice racecar, it'll give us a chance to see just how good they are.

Reply
08/02/2013 15:18

No, but it is a game he likes to play. What can he want from Ferrari right now that would make him bring it up?

Reply
Elephino
09/02/2013 12:01

When Bernie wants something from Luca, he brings up customer cars. When Luca wants something from Bernie, he brings up 3rd cars.

Reply
Tony
11/02/2013 23:09

Lets not forget Niki Lauda was a pay driver and Williams, Hesketh, Tyrrel, Vanwall, all used customer cars at some point, it is also worth pointing out running more than two cars has never been a recipe for an easy life look at BRM.. even when Ferrari did it it wasn't an unreserved triumph.

Reply
12/02/2013 18:45

The winner of the first Monaco GP was a pay driver of sorts - back then a lot of them were given or loaned their racing Bugattis for what we now refer to as escort work...

Running more than two cars can work (or so I've been told by people who've done so). The problem is when the drivers are all contracted to receive equal parts and treatment. That's when the challenge becomes a nightmare.

Reply
Jem
12/02/2013 19:42

Is it practical these days though? Surely there'd be a problem with pit space at Monaco at the very least?

Not sure the grid can take 36 cars, so there would have to be decisions on who gets to run a third car, how those teams are chosen (constructors ranking is only fair if you take an average of all the cars a team runs, which looks messy), but even then the 3-car teams can expect better exposure and therefore sponsor revenue than the two car teams, etc. etc.

I'd be quite interested to see something like the MotoGP wildcard rider system though - allow each team one or two races where they can run a third car - maximum of four wildcards per race, slots chosen either on a US draft system ("picks" allocated well in advance but can be traded between teams) or simply a first pick in previous Constructors Championship order and the second in the reverse order.

Monaco and other unsuitable tracks can simply be excluded from the process.

Would allow more track time for the test and reserve drivers too.

14/02/2013 22:13

And meanwhile, French F1 coverage switches completely to the pay-per-view model with Canal+ for three years starting this season.

Reply
14/02/2013 22:37

I suffered through the TF1 coverage when I lived in France. Trust me, it's no loss.

Reply
15/02/2013 15:41

Except that in the medium-term, the reduction in viewers mean less money for F1 from France. It already appears to have accepted that elsewhere, but it clearly can't afford to do so when the TV total income is down to the same level as the Turkish Premier League.

Jem
15/02/2013 21:30

I'll take free coverage with commentators I can correct over pay coverage any day.

I don't especially want to be a Canal+ customer but seems like I might have to be. Badgers.

16/02/2013 11:54

How about free coverage acquired through nefarious means? I hated TF1 so much - constant ad breaks, stupid letterbox ads OVER the coverage, no analysis, etc - that I just got VPN access.

Do you know any Sky subscribers in the UK who wouldn't mind you putting a Slingbox in their sitting room?

Jem
18/02/2013 09:31

TF1 are useless, this is very true. The advertising is horrific, their commentators haven't learned to shut up when the radio comes on and there's no Ted Kravitz.

The lack of analysis doesn't really trouble me - most of the pre- and post-race coverage on the BBC just repeats stuff I already know from spending half my life on F1 websites of one sort or another.

The sycophantic Grosjean-watching does get on my nerves, but one wonders if British coverage was similar when Lewis Hamilton burst on to the scene and I just didn't notice because I'm British, not French.

It's weird being asked to put my money where my mouth is on this one - not least because I could just pay for Sky at the parental abode and use their SkyGo streaming thingy from France. But it's £381 a year for 19 races, which is about £6.68 an hour - more expensive than the average cinema trip here.

Clearly I get more than just the F1 for my money, but that is precisely the problem. I'd imagine (perhaps incorrectly) that the running costs of Sky's coverage can't be more than the license costs, even including the lighting in the HR department. Which means - for roughly a million viewers - that Sky F1 costs about £60 per person per year. I'd happily pay that.

18/02/2013 11:12

"...but one wonders if British coverage was similar when Lewis Hamilton burst on to the scene..."

Oh God... It. Was. Horrible.

Jem
18/02/2013 12:14

In fairness though, Hamilton delivered the goods and right from the outset. He was 10 races into his F1 career before he *didn't* get on the podium.




Leave a Reply